domenica 4 dicembre 2011

European Journal of Migration and Law, Issue 4 2011

European Journal of Migration and Law

image of Issue 4

sabato 3 dicembre 2011

Jale Tosun and Israel Solorio (eds), Energy and Environment in Europe: Assessing a Complex Relationship

New Special Mini-Issue in European Integration online Papers (EIoP):

Energy and Environment in Europe: Assessing a Complex Relationship
Editors: Jale Tosun and Israel Solorio

Understanding Lifestyle Regulation - Davos, February 23-24, 2012‏

"Dear colleague,
 
I take the liberty to invite you to a 2-day training devoted to
'Lifestyle Regulation' that I organise together with the Global Risk
Forum and the European Journal of Risk Regulation in Davos, Switzerland,
on February 23-24, 2012.
 
The objective of this event is to gather researchers, policymakers,
industry representatives, and academics to discuss the moral, political
and legal issues surrounding the ongoing debate about regulatory action
on lifestyle risk factors, such as unhealthy diets, harmful use of
alcohol, use of tobacco and lack of physical exercise.

venerdì 2 dicembre 2011

Oñati Socio-Legal Series, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2011


Vol 1, No 4 (2011)
Socio-Legal Aspects of Adjudication of International Economic Disputes
Table of Contents
Workshop Papers
Comparing WTO Panelists and ICSID Arbitrators: the Creation of International Legal Fields
Jose Augusto Fontoura Costa
Reform at the top: What's next for the WTO? A second life? A socio-political analysis           
Daniel Drache
From the Green Room to the Court Room (And Back): Judicial Clarification of Ambiguity in WTO Law and the Effects on Subsequent Negotiations         
James Flett      
Contributions and Limitations of Empirical Research on Independence and Impartiality in International Investment Arbitration            
Gus Van Harten          
Corporations and the Uses of Law: International Investment Arbitration as a “Multilateral Legal Order"          
Peter Muchlinski         
Legitimacy and Reflexivity in International Investment Arbitration: A New Self-Restraint?       
David Schneiderman   
Socio-Legal Perspectives on the Adjudication of Cultural Diversity Disputes in International Economic Law   
Valentina Sara Vadi    
Transplanting the European Court of Justice: The Experience of the Andean Tribunal of Justice          
Karen J. Alter, Laurence R. Helfer, Osvaldo Saldías   
Interpretation and Institutional Choice at the WTO      
Gregory Shaffer, Joel Trachtman

Nollkaemper on International Legal Pluralism

Inside or Out: Two Types of International Legal Pluralism


Andre Nollkaemper


University of Amsterdam - Amsterdam Center for International Law



NORMATIVE PLURALISM AND INTERNATIONAL LAW: EXPLORING GLOBAL GOVERNANCE, Jan Klabbers, Touko Piiparinen, eds., Forthcoming
Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2011-48
Amsterdam Center for International Law No. 2011-15

Abstract:     
In this article I explore the distinction and relationship between two types of international legal pluralism. Internal pluralism construes a pluralism that is internal to the international legal order. External pluralism contests any hierarchical claim of international law and thus is external to the international order.

The central argument of the article is that the two types of pluralism, in a somewhat paradoxical way, depend on each other. While the international legal order needs its hierarchical claim to supremacy in order to provide the stability and legal certainty to serve the essential interests of states, communities, and individuals, the legitimacy of its claim to supremacy relies on the inspiration, diversity and politics that are articulated in the paradigm of external pluralism. In turn, the paradigm of external pluralism seems difficult to reconcile with the interests of stability of the international legal system, and yet it relies at least in part on that system since its primarily political project cannot provide stability at the international level.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 63
Keywords: international law, pluralism, supremacy, european union 
 
Full text available at:

Bobek on Procedural Autonomy of Member States

Why There is no Principle of 'Procedural Autonomy' of the Member States


Michal Bobek


University of Oxford, Institute of European and Comparative Law



THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE AND AUTONOMY OF THE MEMBER STATES, pp. 305 - 322, B. de Witte & H. Micklitz, eds., Intersentia, 2011

Abstract:     
The article offers a critical look at the dual requirement of equivalence and effectiveness and at the notion of "procedural autonomy" of the Member States in the area of procedures and remedies for the enforcement of EU law based rights before the Member States' courts. The first part of this article (points 2, 3 and 4) gives a short introduction into the case law and into some doctrinal visions concerning the requirements of equivalence and effectiveness. The second part of the article (points 5 and 6) critically examines these requirements, arguing that their simultaneous use is illogical, unpredictable and misleading and that it should be reconsidered. Finally, it is explained why, in the current state of EU law, there is no such principle as "procedural autonomy" of the Member States in the area of enforcement of EU law based rights on the national level.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 14
Keywords: Enforcement of EU in the Member States, Procedural Autonomy, Equivalence, Effectiveness
Accepted Paper Series 
 
Full text available at: